Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drummerworld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (tending towards, but not quite reaching, keep). Stifle (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Drummerworld

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

NN website, promotionalish in nature, no claims of actual notability. UtherSRG (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Websites,  and Switzerland. UtherSRG (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page before I edited it was mostly promotional fluff, and after my edit is incredibly sparse. Cursory Google revealed no outstanding coverage I could add.  🎜Oktavia Miki🎝 talk 20:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Easy Keep: Sources from Choice Reviews, the DRUM! Magazine source already present (along with various other listings in yearly awards), and Percussive Notes ("Percussion on the World Wide Web" V. 45, I. 3 where it is discussed as the "most popular site for drummers available"). It's also heavily used as a reliable source for biographies on Wikipedia (and in the real world), so as with most periodicals and such, its use becomes its notability (e.g., it's listed on MERLOT ). Finding sources about sources is annoying, but ask, and I can hunt down more about this notable subject. Why? I Ask (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not look notable or encyclopedic. David10244 (talk) 11:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You need a better explanation than WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC. Why? I Ask (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep the sources presented by User:Why? I Ask make it an easy pass of GNG.  Frank  Anchor  03:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Frank Anchor. With Why? I Ask's sources the article passes WP:GNG.  Schminnte (talk • contribs) 01:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.