Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drunvalo Melchizedek (2nd nomination)

Drunvalo Melchizedek
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It's regrettable that this page has remained on Wikipedia for so long. It relies exclusively on primary sources and blog posts. Drunvalo Melchizedek lacks significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. There are no serious reviews of his self published books. Consensus was deletion after a previous nomination in 2012. Not much has changed. He might be well known in New Age pseudoscience circles but there is nothing of substance for a Wikipedia page. Ynsfial (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Spirituality,  and North America. Ynsfial (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arizona and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment The AFD is inaccurate as this is not the same page from 2012. It was recreated from scratch with available info in 2019. Also, the AFD does not actually give any specific grounds for deletion except what sounds like personal disdain, which WP needs to be above. In fact, the deletion submission itself admits topical notability. Whether said topical area is bad or good is not relevant to encyclopedic inclusion. - Keith D. Tyler &para; 12:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)