Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Druth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE BOTH ARTICLES. GTBacchus(talk) 08:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Druth and Drooth
Wikipedia is not a slang guide. This is an unverified dicdef of Scottish slang. See also Drooth. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC) ''This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! '' --Ichiro 19:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete same as Druth BS--Looper5920 13:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC) (This comment moved from Articles for deletion/Drooth &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC))
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary It's a word with no importance and practically no need in an encyclopedia. J.J.Sagnella 18:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsuitable for Wiktionary, IMO. Not even 500 hits for Druth, and most of them are unrelated. Drooth scores almost a thousand hits, many of them unrelated. I did find something apparently related, though. Johnleemk | Talk 06:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.