Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dryden Annual Church Hockey Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly   (hot!)  23:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Dryden Annual Church Hockey Tournament

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Annual amateur ice hockey tournament played between churches in a small remote town? I don't think this passes WP:N. BoojiBoy 18:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It seems like a pretty major tournament for its type. And small remote towns are where the majority of hockey players do come from so that fact isn't really relavent. --Djsasso 18:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per copyvio --Djsasso 05:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; whether it passes WP:N or not, it certainly fails WP:V. Only eleven Google hits  once you exclude this article and the tournament's own website, and for a tourney with an international draw, it's surprising that there's only a single hit from the press, a RSS feed from the International Falls Daily Journal.  If some genuine reliable sources appear, I might change my mind, but it just doesn't seem like the outside world has noticed this tourney, and I see no evidence to suggest this is a "major" tournament, of its type or of any other type.    Ravenswing  18:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN and copyvio to boot. ccwaters 18:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G12. Even if it was notable, it is a blatant copyvio. Resolute 19:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm. Kaiser matias 20:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ravenswing comments above--Pparazorback 02:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete just isn't significant enough, to warrant its own article. GoodDay 17:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.