Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dtach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Dtach

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:BURDEN significantly undersourced and not likely to be the kind of thing useful in the future. Miami33139 (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. Also shows some author bias in: what the developer (Ned T. Crigler) considers to be unneeded features. Grey Wyvern ⚒  22:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd point out that that phrase was in my original article, and I'm not Ned, so it can't be author bias... --Gwern (contribs) 23:58 6 November 2009 (GMT)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.