Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dual Metric Model of Multidimensional Geometry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete -- blatant nonsense, perhaps a test how long it would survive, no hits outside of Wikipedia and mirrors --Pjacobi 08:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Dual Metric Model of Multidimensional Geometry

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is clearly a hoax. Evidence:


 * It's loaded with buzz words and fine sounding phrases about holism, universality and the genius of Einstein, but it does not make any meaningful statements about its subject
 * There are no Google hits for "Dual Metric Model" that aren't derived from this article
 * The author has made no other contributions to this or any other article
 * It was probably written as an abstract (it's the right style and length and begins "This work deals with...") - presumably for a spoof submission to a scientific conference

andy 16:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Even in the unlikely event it's genuine, it's self proclaimed OR —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  17:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. Anville 19:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - well, this reads like gibberish, built around a kernel of true facts. It's either a hoax, or someone's personal WP:OR.  --Haemo 19:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Fails WP:SCIENCE and WP:ATT. No evidence of notability, no attribution, and strong evidence of personal original research.  As best I can tell, this article survived as long as it did because noone noticed it before. --EMS | Talk 19:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions.   -- Pete.Hurd 21:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fails by every criterion. It is rather saddening how long it has surviced. I've speedied ir. --Pjacobi 08:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.