Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dualist nihilism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, a term someone made up. As such it is original research and unverifiable (the sources in the article only talk about nihilism). - Bobet 10:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Dualist nihilism
This article is entirely unreferenced, and an apparent hoax -- searches on altavista and google yielded no results for this particular term. John254 16:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Yes i created this article perhaps somewhat in haste, i admit to it perhaps being somewhat original research, but i really do believe that it is *possible* to find "reliable" sources to back it up, i just have not had the opportunity to do so yet. I suppose i wouldnt be totally heart-broken if this article was deleted but i guess my main point was to try to represent a certain philosophical point of view which, as i wrote in the article, combines about two or three other points of view which are themselves represented by other articles within wikipedia, presumably those articles are acceptable to you, so i dont see why this hybrid article wouldnt be since essentially it references internal wikipedia articles. I agree it probably should have other sources as well, and this may be possible to do, and maybe i should just try to write this article into those other articles (i.e. moral nihilism, philosophy of mathematics, dualism, physicalism. I appreciate your feedback though, and yeah maybe i was too hasty without getting enough other sources first. Lacking Lack 20:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No references or citations, so either hoax or original research.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   16:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This AfD process takes five days. If you can't gather sources together and rewrite the article in that time, take a copy on to a user subpage/sandbox and work on it in private until the article is fit for presentation.   (aeropagitica)    (talk) 


 * Keep if sources are provided as per Lacking Lack's response and User talk:(aeropagitica)'s comment. --HResearcher 05:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment -- it appears that none of the references currently present in the article actually mention the term "Dualist nihilism". Consequently, I don't believe that the references provided satisfy the prerequisites of the conditional keep. John254 22:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.