Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Science Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  03:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Dubai Science Park

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. It's a non-notable company that is framed as "a business community". If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Dubai Holding, which is the company that owns this subsidiary. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Neighbourhoods are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment per WP:GEOFEAT 2 "...commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.", with that said, here is a source assess table:

I will note, this seems to appear in a number of books as well, but the books are either: trivially mentioning the park or are promotional. I could not find any WP:RS about it, and therefore per WP:GEOFEAT this currently fails. Having said that, with the sheer number of mentions it is odd there are are not any WP:RS and hence I think it is possible this article could be kept if there are reliable sources about the science park. With the number of companies there, and number of hits on google for it there should be something. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I have found a couple of independent sources.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks to the additional sources presented by SailingInABathTub NemesisAT (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the independent sources show notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.