Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duberry cheese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. @pple complain 14:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Duberry cheese
I think this article is hoax. All the google hits are mirrors. It has been around for some time so I think more eyes need to examine it.  Birgitte SB  16:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - even if it isn't a hoax, its unsourced and has little assertion of notability besides "its really old". Mr.  Z- man  17:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete probably is a hoax, and it reads like it could be. I can't verify the existence of this cheese, the person who allegedly created it, or the wine he also allegedly created. At best it's not notable. Hut 8.5 17:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for now- http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=%22Duberry+Cheese%22&meta=, not notable necessarily based on ghits, but a variety of cheese is the sort of thing that could easily go under the radar. There is some evidence it is real, for now I would keep an explore.  I imagine there's alot of food you wouldn't find much of... clean up maybe, but I think the product itself could be real.JJJ999 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Even if its real, is it notable? There must be tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of small cheese makers like this, not all should get an article. Mr.  Z- man  05:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * There are thousands of different chemical compositions, many of which are almost impossible to find on earth, and some which exist for only microseconds. This cheese, like other food products such as pop tarts, could be in a similar category, provided it is a unique product, not simply someones personal name for a pre-existing product.JJJ999 05:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * What exactly are you saying is a good hit? Can you give an exact page rather than a google result full of Wiki mirrors (which I mentioned in the nom)?  Remember this article has existed on Wikipedia since March 14 of 2006 and has been copied numerous places since then.-- Birgitte  SB  18:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BirgitteSB-prod (talk • contribs)
 * I am not necessarily saying there are, does the last one on the first search look ok to you guys? I guess it could be copied, but could we ask the early contributors first...?JJJ999 22:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You mean User:Pedropolo, User:82.2.5.112, or User:Benny889? They are the only ones to make any significant contributions and none have edited since 2006. The page has not changed significantly since then. Mr.  Z- man  22:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * One file I noticed at the bottom of the first google search looked similar... it could be a mirror, but the product could also be real. I am going to hold out and see if someone can present an argument before I retract keep.JJJ999 23:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Every item in the list of ghits is a mirror or a alphabetical listing of topics. Id you are referring to, it too is a mirror -- a mirror of this article, and a prime example of total nonsense. That it has lasted this long is a shame to WP.  Time for a SNOW Delete.DGG (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - unable to find any reliable sources. -- Whpq 16:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this now qualifies for WP:SNOWy closure does it not. Burntsauce 17:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does not establish the notability or even the existence of such a cheese. --Kudret abi Talk 06:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.