Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete --Gareth Hughes 21:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Dubism
its true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.211.189 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now.  Delete, nonsense, and I rather suspect a nonsense tag would stick on it, though some of it is sort of coherent. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 12:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   14:08, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * There isn't a nomination. Uncle G 14:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Wasn't Cryptic (talk) listing a nom? Delete anyway.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   15:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The article is about a religion whose holy books it states to be "the Duble, the Dorah, Dubdas and the Du'ran", one of whose tenets it states to be "There Is No Pie", and whose characters it states to include the "Muffins of Doom". This is an obvious parody.  Furthermore its edit history shows that it is a parody being constructed here on Wikipedia directly.  Ironically, the article appears unrelated to the fact that people who have ceased to be Jehovah's Witnesses refer to practitioners of that religion as "dubs" and the religion as "dubism". Delete. Uncle G 14:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per Uncle G. Xoloz 12:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --Rogerd 09:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.