Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dublin Forum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 16:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Dublin Forum
This was founded by Kevin Byrne. Notable? Fplay 05:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Per the news coverage in the Irish Examiner, yes. Keep. Uncle G 19:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article reads like an advertisement. Djegan 13:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but retain cleanup tag. It's marginally notable in my view, but it's too close to being a vanity article at this stage.  If we do delete it, can we delete Freedom Institute also? --Ryano 13:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  Merits an external link at the Fianna Fail page.  And by all means nominate the Freedom Institute, pace the Lebanon Daily Star's encomiums. Joestynes
 * Merge with Fianna Fail article-ant_ie 18:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Uncle G. -- JJay 21:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Joestynes -- Rye1967 23:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears notable as Uncle G pointed out. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable enough. RMoloney (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, even if it hasn't appeared in the Daily Star, but endorse Ryano's comments re cleanup - it needs very severe pruning. Funny, I am a regular reader of the Daily Star but missed the stuff about the appalling Freedom Institute. Unsurprising, since following the link given in the article led me to a piece which didn't mention the FI. Ho-hum. Palmiro | Talk 03:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.