Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duboisville, Michigan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closed early per WP:SKCRIT #2b. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 17:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Duboisville, Michigan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable place. Fails WP:GEO and WP:V.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep but significantly improve. Has full paragraph here, which is clearly about the same town but contradicts quite a few facts from the other source, here. No idea how this fails WP:V though, not hard to find these sources. Fram (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * See also e.g. here: while it is a self-published source, it again makes it clear that this was a true village, not just some named farm or so. Fram (talk) 13:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * And here, calling it "once a trading center of importance". Fram (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Finally here it is called an "old village". By all accounts meets WP:GEO and WP:V quite clearly. Fram (talk) 13:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Fram has very clearly found sources that show notability. Assuming I correctly copied what Romig said on this place, he seems to not be a very reliable source. I am going to try to incorporate Fram's finds into the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: For someone as ready as Lugnuts to howl WP:BEFORE! at the drop of a byte, he doesn't seem to have exerted himself much on this pointy AfD ... and this really isn't a good look for someone who's Wikipedia's champion for creating SIGCOV-less sub-stubs, to the point that he was recently community banned from stub creation for six months. Obvious sources are obvious.  I'm comfortable with calling this a bad faith nomination.   Ravenswing      14:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.