Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchess Anastasia of Mecklenburg-Schwerin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Duchess Anastasia of Mecklenburg-Schwerin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Here we have yet another genealogical entry. I see no indication of significant coverage either in the article or elsewhere on the Internet, and I can say with certainty that WP:GNG and WP:BASIC are not met. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for random genealogy; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. It is also not the place to attribute lofty and abolished titles to obscure, private, living individuals with no indication that they ever went by such titles, nor is it the place to expose personal information (names and dates of birth) of the underage children of obscure individuals. This sort of articles is always a WP:OR mess. Surtsicna (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 18:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 0qd (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the other comments above, this position was abolished before this person was born, no notabilty.Smeat75 (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families.  // Timothy ::  talk  05:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Frederick Francis IV, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, her father and last reigning monarch of that principality. Since her husband's article at Prince Friedrich Ferdinand of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg will almost certainly be deleted and/or merged, I would send the information to her father's article. Again, pinging for his opinion. Bearian (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Bearian, West Virginian has asked not to be informed about these discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.