Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchy of Urnst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess. The parent article is a natural redirect target for this. How much content is to be merged is left to editor discretion. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Duchy of Urnst

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic does not currently establish notability. TTN (talk) 22:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete but I recommend this AfD be combined with the Wolf Nomads one. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 23:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unless third-party sources are forthcoming. I've no particular opposition to a merge or a redirect if someone believes it useful. These D&D nominations have traditionally been fairly controversial; a one-at-a-time approach does seem to work well, even if it can be a little slower than some of us might like. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M: no argument that this content has any other deficiency than simple non-notability has been advanced, making the delete arguments non-policy-based: deletion on the basis of non-notability is only for when no suitable merge target exists, which is not the case here. Jclemens (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Flanaess. Deleting this article would mean Wikipedia would have no information on the subject matter, despite linking to this page multiple times on Flanaess.  Frankly, I've found Wikipedia's content on the geography of the worlds of Dungeons and Dragons to be fairly lacking as is. Borderlandor (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want full coverage of the geography of the worlds of Dungeons and Dragons, you should buy the original source books. The material should not be present in an encyclopedia in anywhere near this level of detail. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking third-party coverage, or a very selective merge if a suitable target can be identified. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.