Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudley A. Guglielmo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Dudley A. Guglielmo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Sources include an article on an insurance commissioner election, an advertisement, a link to the Louisiana Political Museum and Hall of Fame, a genealogy website, an unlinked link to his obituary and an unknown deadlink. Penale52 (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Another Billy Hathorn Special. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  23:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting because of the late arrival of new sources.
 * Delete - I think the clearer component here is WP:NPOL (as an elected position not comparable in importance to those included), the level clearly isn't met. No obvious redirect target Nosebagbear (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep elected statewide constitutional official; member of Political Hall of Fame71.41.193.74 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added new RS and I feel the subject now meets WP:GNG. Additionally, I feel that this person does, in fact, meet WP:NPOL because he held and (elected and constitutional) "sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office". Emass100 (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as the subject was elected to the position of Louisiana Insurance Commission. That said, the article itself should be completely rewritten to focus on the subject. --Enos733 (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per recent comments above. TheEditster (talk) 09:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The first Clarion Herald source doesn't cover Dudley in much detail and doesn't appear to meet SIGCOV. The 2nd Clarion Herald source appears to just be a political ad, failing WP:INDEPENDENT, so definitely doesn't help notability. The cdnc includes a small amount on Dudley that definitely doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. So these extra sources don't appear to aid notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Take a look at this. Pages after pages of RS covevage on this subject in the Monroe News Star and the Monroe Morning World. Sadly I cannot access these article to assess if they are significant coverage, nor add them in the article, but I think the sheer amount of them demonstrates well the notability of the subject. Emass100 (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN Lubbad85 (talk) 00:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment To be clear, my keep position is based on the subject passing WP:NPOL as a statewide elected official (Louisiana Insurance Commissioner). There is a presumption of notability for individuals who "have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office." --Enos733 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to Keep as he was a statewide elected official and therefore passes WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.