Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudley Poplak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Dudley Poplak

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Being an interior decorator does not make one notable. If there's more to him than this, please provide the evidence. We have no SSGs for interior decorators-- for a reason. A loose necktie (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep He does seem to have been a notable interior designer, however. He designed multiple home interiors for the royal family, among others, and was noted repeatedly in the news for his work. Here's some examples:
 * News database access is useful though, since many of the articles are from the 80's or otherwise decades ago and a lot of UK publications don't have public access. The Wikipedia LIbrary is good to have in order to access a lot of that. Silver  seren C 17:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * News database access is useful though, since many of the articles are from the 80's or otherwise decades ago and a lot of UK publications don't have public access. The Wikipedia LIbrary is good to have in order to access a lot of that. Silver  seren C 17:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * News database access is useful though, since many of the articles are from the 80's or otherwise decades ago and a lot of UK publications don't have public access. The Wikipedia LIbrary is good to have in order to access a lot of that. Silver  seren C 17:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * News database access is useful though, since many of the articles are from the 80's or otherwise decades ago and a lot of UK publications don't have public access. The Wikipedia LIbrary is good to have in order to access a lot of that. Silver  seren C 17:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * News database access is useful though, since many of the articles are from the 80's or otherwise decades ago and a lot of UK publications don't have public access. The Wikipedia LIbrary is good to have in order to access a lot of that. Silver  seren C 17:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Silver seren has demonstrated that Poplak received reliable independent coverage going back nearly 25 years. I think GNG is demonstrated. I have found that generally someone who has an obituary in The Times, a paper of record in the UK, very likely has previous coverage which would make them meet GNG guidelines. Thriley (talk) 04:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep - per WP:HEY if and only if the sources found are added to the stub. Bearian (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.