Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duel Decks: Jace vs. Chandra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. That is, delete all.  Sandstein  10:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Duel Decks: Jace vs. Chandra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The Magic: The Gathering duel decks are simply reprints of printed cards. The articles are stubs, and have been since their release, with the only "references" being postings on MTG-related sites. This topic belongs more on the MTG Wikia rather than here. These should either be merged into one article or deleted outright. I am nominating the following duel decks for deletion as well:

p b  p  23:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Duel Decks: Elves vs. Goblins
 * Duel Decks: Divine vs. Demonic
 * Duel Decks: Garruk vs. Liliana
 * Duel Decks: Phyrexia vs. The Coalition
 * Duel Decks: Elspeth vs. Tezzeret
 * Duel Decks: Knights vs. Dragons
 * Duel Decks: Ajani vs. Nicol Bolas
 * Duel Decks: Venser vs. Koth
 * Duel Decks: Izzet vs. Golgari
 * Duel Decks: Sorin vs. Tibalt
 * Nom comment: I have nominated another batch of MTG reprints at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From the Vault: Dragons p  b  p  21:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - there would seem to be a bucket-load of in-universe MTG stuff that just isn't anywhere near notable outside the MTG community. There are no independent sources that would suggest this is a notable product. High-level MTG stuff might be notable but we need to start working on this walled-garden stuff before it becomes Pokemon-like. Stalwart 111  01:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * If possible, I'd think there'd be a potential merge target where the Duel Decks product is described within the history of the MTG franchise, but barring that, delete all as unexpandable stubs/in-universe excessive detail. --M ASEM (t) 01:00, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom and as unsourced by third party references. The wikia does a good job discussing the duel decks anyways so no info is actually lost.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge per Masem. Crazynast 21:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all. The existence of these sets of cards could be mentioned in some more general article, but there is nothing suitable to merge: the content of these articles is all in-universe cruft repeating primary sources, material for Wikia's Magic:_The_Gathering_Wiki but not for Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.