Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duga Rijeka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Duga Rijeka

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NPLACE, WP:GNG and only cites one single source. Cupper52 (talk) 11:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:NPLACE; populated villages are generally kept Spiderone  17:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, this is not a correct reading of WP:NPLACE, this is a typical gazeteer entry per WP:5P1. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND. Reporting a population as a settlement in an official government census should meet GEOLAND #1. Hog Farm Talk 23:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NGEO, reminds me of "Article content does not determine notability", btw there is a smidgeon more at the wikiCroatian article. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NPLACE/WP:GEOLAND. Bingo bro   (Chat)  05:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.