Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dugald macpherson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-23 08:53Z 

Dugald macpherson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN, i'm guessing. --Hojimachongtalk con 08:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I think he qualifies as notable under criterion 2 of Notability (academics). Further, the book "notes on infinite permutation groups" probably qualifies himunder criterion 3.2. For example it is recommended reading for the following two courses: http://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/KMathF/math/diskret/buecher.html http://www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/mi/studium/kvv/ws0102/felgner1.html Thehalfone 09:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   -- David Eppstein 05:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep He is a full professor at a major university. He has therefore undergone several peer-reviews by experts, & I would accept their judgement. For those who prefer our customary WP judgement, by our own imperfect criteria, he is clearly N, for writing a textbook used in several universities is accepted as N. The article should of course be expanded, DGG 06:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)!
 * Keep per DGG and Thehalfone. In addition, he is a winner of the Junior Berwick Prize, a middling-to-major British mathematical prize. -- Charlene 08:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, regardless if we know who Prof MacPherson is there are no references so others can verify, therefore major problem with WP:V Alf photoman 16:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but needs major work and further sourcing. - WeniWidiWiki 05:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have done some work on it. I used a citation template for the book, but it is terrible: the first author has a different formatting for her name than the others! Is this supposed to a main author and subsiduary ones? In this part of mathematics, its not usually done like that, but just alphabetically. Thehalfone 16:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.