Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duhfault

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:08, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Duhfault
Submitted in good faith, I believe, but this is a dictionary definition and also a neologism. See What Wikipedia is not. Also, please take note that I have supplied a valid reason for deletion, rather than asking a question. Meelar (talk) 00:03, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete/Transwiki. Dicdefs as good as they can be don't belong in Wikipedia. --Neigel von Teighen 00:03, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Lacrimosus 01:55, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --InShaneee 04:35, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * A copy&paste of the Urban Dictionary entry, that aimed for the dictionary but hit the encyclopaedia instead. Urban Dictionary's terms of service  are not GFDL compatible, and this is a Copyvio. Uncle G 06:13, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)
 * Replace with redirect to Dilbert, DNRC or Induhvidual. Radiant_* 09:51, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism., copyright violation. Megan1967 06:40, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.