Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duhin Nanda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Duhin Nanda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a non-notable television host who fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Poorly sourced and does not appear to meet WP:GNG. A search for sources yields video content featuring the subject of the article, but there is nothing substantive in WP:RS about him. -- Kinu t/c 23:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Non Notable, It's clear WP:TOOSOON, Fails WP:GNG, Nothing is proven here at reliable source.- Nahal (T) 01:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I'm not for a speedy here unless we hit the WP:SNOW wall. It really is too soon for this one.  Let's give some time and put him back later. Seems a smidge promotional. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 07:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's got better sourcing. There are plausible notability claims here, but there's nothing that's so "inherently" notable that it would entitle him to rest entirely on primary sources instead of reliable ones — and no, the existence of one "alumni get jobs" article in the student newspaper of his own alma mater is not a notability clincher in and of itself either. The notability test for a person is not the things the article says, it's the depth and quality of the sources you can or can't use to support the things the article says. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.