Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke of Kent School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Also, next time please wait a bit before starting an AfD discussion, to give a creator time to expand an article to an acceptable form. (non-admin closure) Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  15:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Duke of Kent School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The school does not appear to meet WP:GNG as I could not find a significant amount of coverage from independent, reliable sources. AmericanSoil (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have added to the article; school has an interesting history. Tacyarg (talk) 12:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is sufficiently sourced. Markvs88 (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - article was nominated 8 minutes after creation! This has hardly allowed much time to carry out due diligence! In any case, this is a school that has secondary streams that occupies a listed building. It is clear that sufficient sources exist to meet WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 23:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - The school is named after Duke of Kent, which definitely makes it harder to search for coverage from independent, reliable sources. Given more time, as what some above had done, more notable details and reliable sources can be found. 8 minutes between article creation and nomination is definitely not enough time to flesh out the article. robertsky (talk) 07:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.