Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duklr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  00:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Duklr

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seemingly non-notable organisation, appears to actually just be spam. I can't find any particular notable coverage of it in new sources or third party references that aren't clearly written promotional pieces or press release type notes (see the references that were added to the article for examples of how there's no coverage.) Fails WP:ORG. Canterbury Tail talk 11:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs: ,

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 02:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - can't find any real mentions of this, and the article itself is rather promotional in tone. Remagoxer (talk) 11:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.