Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dulbecco's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Dulbecco's law

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced and seems non-notable to me; only 34 Google hits. TomTheHand 16:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability and no verifiable sources. Also, no mention of this "law" on Dulbecco's page so presumably not that important to him.  The Rambling Man 16:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, even by Dulbecco.--Anthony.bradbury 17:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ThuranX 20:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, only 34 ghits does not indicate substantial enough notability.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.