Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dump.fm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Dump.fm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable website. References to blog posts and web directory listings do not establish notability per WP:WEB. The metronews reference might be non-trivial third party coverage, but a Google search did not turn up similar material. VQuakr (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- —  m o n o   19:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Front-end for Twitter. T3h   1337   b0y  19:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you provide a little more information? I am not sure I understand your reason. VQuakr (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Kinda like ping.fm is notable. T3h   1337   b0y  20:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Just because similar stuff exists doesn't mean a product is notable. Notability is determined by significant coverage in reliable sources. — m o n o   20:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as article fails WP:GNG (no reliable secondary sources) and WP:WEB. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  18:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. No outside evidence that the website has enough coverage. Shadowjams (talk) 01:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.