Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Hames


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Duncan Hames

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable local politician and election candidate with no reliable 3rd party sources Valenciano (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:POLITICIAN merely being a candidate isn't sufficient.  No additional notability is alleged.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete for now without prejudice to recreation in the future. The only reliable and independent source i can find at the moment is this from the regional section of the BBC Politics Show in 2006, which doesn't seem quite enough by itself. As it's a new seat and expected to be a close fight he'll probably get plenty of news coverage a bit closer to the next general election though, and once he has the article can be re-created with suitable sources. Qwfp (talk) 07:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.