Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dundee Cell Products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America1000 04:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Dundee Cell Products

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

company no longer exists DC Bio2017 (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment:, whether a "company no longer exists" is not in itself a sustainable rationale for deletion. It would appear from your Draft:DC Biosciences Ltd that you may be trying to create an article under the firm's newer name - If so, a retitle would be an appropriate outcome? But please also note WP:DISCLOSE. AllyD (talk) 20:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The page seems to be fine, aside from a few citation issues. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 01:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as the nominator does not advance any valid reason for deletion. If a rename is needed then that can be done without deletion. My impression is that the company is trying to treat Wikipedia as part of its marketing department. It is not: it is an encyclopedia. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.