Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunderpatrullen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Dunderpatrullen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Smartyllama (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * comment What sort of source is LTZ? It looks like a general news publication, though of course I can't read the language so can't tell - David Gerard (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it's short for "länstidningen", which basically means "local newspaper" - the publisher MittMedia is Sweden's biggest publisher of local daily newspapers, so I think that this is exactly what LTZ is. Richard3120 (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yup, it's Länstidningen Östersund, if translations are required I'd be happy to provide.lovkal (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I was just wanting to know if the LTZ links in the article are the sort of think you think would count as nontrivial RS mentions for en:wp purposes on this article - David Gerard (talk) 19:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * LTZ is a local newspaper with a seemingly clean record, and they certainly don't seem to be affiliated with the band. I'd say they count. They have been adressed multiple times by the Swedish state-run radio network as well. lovkal (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * In that case, keep - David Gerard (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * dispute I don't see how it fails Notability guidelines? It has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself, check the references list. If Swedish Wikipedia is allowed to have this article, why can't English Wikipedia have it as well? lovkal (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of substantive coverage in reliable independent sources. Guy (Help!) 15:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This doesn't match what's already in the article - David Gerard (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Has substantial coverage in Swedish media. They also pass WP:BAND at least in point 5 (Warner Music Sweden belongs to the Warner Music Group), as well as point 11 and/or 12 (they have been aired/covered on Sveriges Radio apparently). Dead Mary (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.