Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dundurn Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 18:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Dundurn Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no indication of meeting notability guidelines. Only source given is a directory entry. Google searches not finding anything significant. Contested prod. noq (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - The major imprint of this company is "Dundurn Press". A search for this particular imprint shows this article behind a paywall, but the article is clearly substantial (712 word), and features this press as the primary subject.  Their expansion through acquisition is covered in trade press.  A google news search shows many of the books they publish are reviewed in newspapers, and authors publishing under them have been nominated for book awards (e.g., ).  Even reissues garner notice.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, great analysis by, above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not a major award, but it still received coverage in a mainstream daily, Dundurn Press won the first Wilson Prize. -- Whpq (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.