Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeon Design Panel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  01:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Dungeon Design Panel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an article on a panel assembled by a Dungeons & Dragons (D&D) magazine to judge the 30 greatest D&D games of all time, for their November 2004 anniversary issue. It lacks historic notability, being basically, an ad-hoc group that existed to create one feature article, in one issue of a single fan magazine. A quick google search shows the panel did not have any other significant existence, did nothing else, and the (very few) references to it are either echoes of our own article, or a few blog entries discussing that issue. A search for the feature by its title also gives very few results, namely the publisher's website, Wikipedia mirrors and echoes, and a few blog/wiki/forum entries. FT2 (Talk 09:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: suggested at Talk:Dungeons and Dragons that this should be noted in a sentence or two in the D&D article. Perhaps best to redirect to D&D? FT2 (Talk 18:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This in non-notable and should go. An article by committee. --Jack Merridew 10:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment — See The 30 Greatest D&D Adventures of All Time; oldid which was merged into Dungeon Design Panel and now redirects to it — the list of 30 games (which was just removed as a copyvio). --Jack Merridew 11:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete ad-hoc panel composed for what looks like a single article that is more than likely not notable itself. Lankiveil (talk) 13:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. This was the very first Wikipedia page I ever created, and it's not worth having on the site for a number of reasons. Let's get rid of it.Iquander (talk) 19:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.