Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeon management game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Construction and management simulation. Courcelles 04:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Dungeon management game

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating as notability concerns have not been addressed and earlier PROD declined. The term "dungeon management game" is both WP:NEO and WP:OR. No reliable source has coined this term to mean a CMS sub-genre. The article relies on this phrase being used by a few sources, however the authors show no intention of coining a new term or a subgenre name. Such a conclusion is strong original research. "Dungeon management" is simply a description, like "Hotel manager" or "Restaurant manager" in all these cases; this does not make it a genre and no reliable sources claim it to be genre. In short, the topic has not been the subject of in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 10:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge + Redirect to Construction and management simulation. It's a reasonable division but still a rather new term (if anything, most seem to use Dungeon Keeper clone but that's not consistently used). --M ASEM  (t) 15:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Construction and management simulation and Strategy video game, both of which the article claims to be a subgenre of - essentially, it is a hybrid of both. Not sure which one to redirect to. Ansh666 17:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.