Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunia Montenegro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Dunia Montenegro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was kept because of pornbio but the community has done away with that and this does not pass GNG or ENT. Of the 3 sources raised last time. The BBC is about something else and she is just quoted and the other two el pais and espresso are not about her either. Spartaz Humbug! 12:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. PORNBIO has been deprecated & there's nothing better. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep To answer the nominator per the GNG, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". To recap, she has been covered by the BBC, El País, and Expresso. Montenegro has also been discussed in scholarly work . Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The first is a broken link for me. The second is an interview of her and there not independant. It's all not about her but taking her opinion about the subject of the book. That's not GNG worthy. Spartaz Humbug! 15:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete The "article" is one sentence with a smattering of un-notable awards. Trillfendi (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * JFTR, NINFA Award is a "thing", or rather, a redirect. Admittedly "best supporting" categories don't sound notable, but that's a fate they share with tons of Webby, Teen Choice, and so on categories. –84.46.53.249 (talk) 07:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If it didn't count when PORNBIO was around its sure as damned doesn't count now. Spartaz Humbug! 15:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Allegedly the oldest XXX award in Europe, and exist: If you intend to restrict XXX awards to AVN it won't work, enwiki is not uswiki. I can't guess if it's better or worse than XBIZ (US) or Venus (Germany), and I'm glad that PORNBIO is gone. –84.46.53.163 (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - Virtually meets WP:BASIC, but lacks sources.Guilherme Burn (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * How does it virtually meet basic? Lacks sources is the definition of non notable. Spartaz Humbug! 15:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.