Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlap-Stone University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Dunlap-Stone University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NORG and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Per WP:NSCHOOL, for profit colleges are not inherently notable. No SIGCOV for subject Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 14:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. The Banner  talk 17:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. Graywalls (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets #2 of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. There are additional mentions in Google news such as Washington Post and Phoenix News Times. These references have been now added. Expertwikiguy (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * RFC explaining why you should not use Schooloutcomes as an argument. The Banner  talk 19:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 22:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.