Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunt dunt dunt (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted as a hoax (a3). - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Dunt dunt dunt
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism. While the article appears at first glance to be well sourced, "dunt" does not appear in any of the sources. Good faith gsearch fails to turn up this usage in the first several pages of hits; gnews search doesn't turn up this usage at all. I declined the patent nonsense speedy because it clearly doesn't meet that criterion, nor does it meet any of the other criteria. Since the speedy was contested, went straight to AfD. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  18:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.