Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duo Triad Tokomak collider (DTTC) hub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW (Essay, notability, OR, and copyright) j &#9883; e decker  talk  17:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Duo Triad Tokomak collider (DTTC) hub

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Original research. Long essay/study that seems more suited for a scholarly journal. Goodvac  ( talk ) 08:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow... Mtiffany71 (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage to support an article.  GB  fan  13:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a personal essay. J I P  &#124; Talk 13:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails GNG, there is no significant coverage. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  16:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete it appears to be pasted from a patent -possible copyright issues. Nergaal (talk) 19:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Essay, may not be encyclopaedic even with substantial re-write. --ZhongHan (Email) 12:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.