Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duopenis

Unverifiable content by a confessed Slashdot troll now on Wikipedia. The supposed millionaire turns up no related Google hits. Searches for "duopenis" or "duo penis" shows the practice of vertical penile piercing. The biological term is, I believe, "bifurcated penis," and oppossums have them. Very highly suspect stuff. Geogre 13:29, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Even w/o the trolling confessions, the google tests I have also tried seems enough for me. BACbKA 14:31, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think there is such a condition (a very rare one) among humans like that mentioned in the article, but I'm certain "duopenis" isn't the correct medical term. Google also contains no mention of a millionaire adult film star named Jo(h)nathan Whitfield with the condition. Livajo 15:09, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Two minutes of research turns up an existing article at Diphallia. Redirect is in place to prevent re-creation. -- Netoholic @ 15:29, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * And so you merged highly suspect information into diphallia? Why?  Had you found external verification for the "myth" of sharks or pigs? Geogre 16:36, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes I did find external verification, as anyone would looking at this for more than two seconds . pig shark -- Netoholic @ 20:45, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * And you didn't feel that you needed to insert any references? You also felt that this was of vital importance to the diphallia article?  Have you ever heard of the importance of negative findings?  Read many papers about things not being found in sharks?  I'm not interested in churlish edit wars with you. Geogre 01:26, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * We don't link external sources for every tidbit of fact in an article. But then, even if I wanted to, you've protected the page (against policy) to prevent my attempts. -- Netoholic @ 01:56, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Is it true that plankton do not have diphallia? How about clams?  How about coral?  Why aren't you including those "facts" that don't need documentation?  Is it true that diphallia occurs in most mammals and is usually fatal?  Anyone who does more than two seconds of research knows that mutations and birth defects occur in all forms.  Why haven't you included that?  Could it be that you are so in love with your decision to "merge" and redirect that you cannot listen to the community, cannot follow sane article construction, and would willingly go into an edit war over an irrelevant and unsubstantiated sentence?  You keep putting it in, and I'll keep taking it out, without violating the 3 revert rule until someone decides to listen to the community. Geogre 02:33, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to diphallia. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:19, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep as redirect. Davodd 17:22, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * keep redirect; don't crocodiles have two penises or something? Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 17:27, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * And now for something completely different. A man with three buttocks! -- Wile E. Heresiarch 15:42, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete in any form. Term is not in use. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:05, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Diphallia and bifuracted penises are both actual phenomena. The "word" "duopenis", and this article, are non-entities. Delete. -Sean Curtin 23:00, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - original fiction - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  23:26, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 20:04, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)