Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durabak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 16:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Durabak

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable product by a non-notable company. As the author stated when removing my previous prod tag, the page about this new product will be linked to other wiki pages about safety coatings and floor substrates. As far as I can see we've only got pages about general types and methods of coatings and industrial coatings though, not about specific brands and products. De728631 (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. G11 and G12. This in nothing but a direct copy/paste of advertising from the one external link.--Talain (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Accurate Independent View The information on this product has been submitted by a neutral wiki submitter and is in no way a direct copy of the external link. Articles on the substance from published sources will be added. This is a U.S. Government used product as submitted by the reports.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 320i (talk • contribs) 22:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment — The problem here is not neutrality or insufficient sources, the problem is general notability. A few reports that have to write about the subject anyway do not establish general notability required for inclusion on Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * hangon- If a company is not known to the general public but has a great presence in the civilian or DOD governmental communities for instance, does this constitute (non establishment of general notability)? Wiki should be a forum where information can be shared. For instance should (Scotch Tape) be removed? Given this rational it should be along with any other brand name or trademarked name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 320i (talk • contribs) 22:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:N for our guideline on notability. Wizard191 (talk) 23:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - An article that does not assert notability with reliable third-party sources. Wizard191 (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.