Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durabom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Durabom

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Product does not appear to actually exist. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no information about a paint product called "Durabom" though perhaps it is a typo and the author intended to describe "Durabond" or "Dura-Bond". There are companies and several products by other companies that use that name, or variations thereof. We shouldn't keep an unreferenced article about a product or company whose name and identity we aren't even sure about.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  05:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Due diligence web search brings up no results. As  Cullen 328 says, it may be a misspelling, but as it is the article is unreferenced and of no obvious notability. Michaelmas1957 05:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete – I asked for a PROD. Zero related ghits. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   07:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no, there's nothing out there. 'Bom' could be Portuguese for good, leaving the "U.S." claim unexplained. No idea, but a speedy appears entirely justified. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - After a lot of search in Google, I can't find any reliable sources. A speedy would still be problematic.  →TSU tp* 17:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.