Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durbans very own records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 15:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Durbans very own records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Does not meet the general notability clause as there is no significant coverage in reliable third party sources of the label. sandgemADDICT yeah? 03:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - I would have speedied it as being made up or a complete hoax. Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's a blog, that's it. Non-notable company. GABgab 13:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: it's not a hoax, but it is a non-notable record label and fails WP:CORP. Article creator has been blocked, no coverage found anywhere on the internet apart from the company's own Facebook page, and even their blogspot contains no posts at all. Richard3120 (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.