Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durga Boro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep per withdrawn nomination and no outstanding delete !votes. (NAC) - Spaceman  Spiff  17:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Durga Boro

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original PROD was removed by an IP address. Fails WP:ATHLETE, has not played in a professional league. Eddie6705 (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Eddie6705 (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:ATHLETE. The IPL is a fully-pro league, and this news article describes him as a player who "consistently finds his name in the first XI", indicating he is a first-team regular. GiantSnowman 14:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  19:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per GiantSnowman. Joe Chill (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per GiantSnowman. Nfitz (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Indian league is fully pro Spiderone  14:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I had not seen that news article when nominating. I understand the league is professional, but i couldn't find any stats to suggest he had played. Am happy to be proven wrong and don't mind withdrawing the nomination. Eddie6705 (talk) 14:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.