Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durham Travel Services (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5 &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Durham Travel Services
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by known sock puppet - same rationale as last AfD - Little known independant company, only one (sorta) notable source being BBC News, not really enough to warrant notability. Nordic  Nightfury  13:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Nightfury  13:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Nightfury  13:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Nightfury  13:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete as it stands little evidence of notability - I'm not convinced by the prurient coverage of its collapse even if it was in nominal RSes - David Gerard (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. CSD WP:G5 Creations by banned or blocked users.
 * User:Ibsiadkgneoeb indef blocked June 2014.
 * Article created by user:Busgb, August 2014‎.
 * Bugsb indef blocked as sock of Ibsiadkgneoeb..
 * Also, article previously deleted as non-notable. A non-Notable defunct company is not realistically going to increase in Notability more than a decade after ceasing to exist. Alsee (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.