Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dusan Zarubica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Dusan Zarubica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Strike 1: being "Economic Counselor at the Serbian Embassy in Romania" does not earn you a spot in an encyclopedia.
 * Strike 2: your sources are atrocious.
 * Strike 3: your only contribution to Wikipedia is this article, and you pick the username Dusanzarubica.
 * "You are the Weakest Link, goodbye!" - Biruitorul Talk 05:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Strike 1: articles about "Economic counselor" is common on Wikipedia http://www.en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=economic+counsellor&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1
 * Strike 2: sources are relevant confirmation of the data in the article in accordance with the Wikipedia "Neutral point of view" policy
 * Strike 3: the article will be expended in the future
 * Note: the above rebuttal was written by User:Dusanzarubica but for some reason not signed or auto-signed. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails GNG searching the web I couldn't find anything that had 'Dusan Zarubica' as a main topic of material, fails WP:POLITICIAN as insignificant political figure, and also obvious conflict of interest as it's possibly an autobiography, WP:SELFPROMOTION.  Alex discussion ★ 08:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not very notable at all. 23 editor (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.