Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin Pead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Dustin Pead

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Delete: Found some passing mentions about this person, but nothing more than that. Subject does not pass WP:JUDGE or WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. User:Let'srun 01:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Snickers2686 (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Florida, Utah, Virginia,  and Washington.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  23:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Citations are passing mentions and profiles.Royal88888 (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG with only passing mentions and a story about his Halloween setup; this is not an elected office so NPOL doesnt apply. --hroest 18:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete besides some passing mentions, it lacks in-depth coverage. - Tumbuka Arch (talk) 16:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.