Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin Stevenson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Dustin Stevenson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable hockey player. I am surprised as how many such articles Dolovis created. As in, I am sometimes not quite sure how Dolovis created this many articles period.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable career, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count, and the simple reason he got away with it for so many years is that it's an order of magnitude easier to get a newbie indeffed for a half-dozen disruptive edits than it is to indef a veteran editor for a thousand disruptive edits.   Ravenswing   01:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be fair, this player did meet our old notability standard by virtue of playing more than 100 AHL games. So I can't really call this article disruptive, even if it is non-notable under our current standards. Rlendog (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.