Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutch irregular verbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core des at 04:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Dutch irregular verbs
Nothing more than a list of words. Wikipedia is neither a dictionary nor an indiscriminate collection of information. Suggesting a transwiki to Wiktionary. MER-C 11:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Chris Kreider 11:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary per MER-C. Cheers -- Imo  eng  11:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  Weak Transwiki  to Wiktionary. This information could be useful there.-- Hús  ö  nd  15:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Please read the article being discussed. It links to one of the places where Wiktionary already has this class of words covered (Wiktionary making the correct distinction between a strong verb and an irregular verb, moreover.), the other being wikt:Category:Dutch irregular verbs. Uncle G 16:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that link at the bottom. Changed to delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Does it contain EVERY irregular verb.  If not, it's a useless list.  It doesn't claim to have every one ("List of commonly used") so therefore non-exhaustive and not needed.  Emeraude 18:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G; many of these are regular verbs. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.