Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutiful films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Dutiful films

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only claim to notability for this film company is that it created a couple of films which were moderately successful on YouTube. I can find no sources to establish notability for this company.

I am also nominating:

The latter two had been PRODed today, but I thought it would be better to include them in this AfD as the four articles are all related (there was also Latest pursuit which I deleted per WP:CSD A7). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:51, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even any real claim of notability on pages, much less sign of it. -Nat Gertler (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all for failing inclusion criteria. The film company exists but fails WP:CORP. The film exists but fails WP:NF. The filmaker and his brother exist but fail WP:BASIC. Clean sweep.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Carara (film) the article has been updated with further relevant sources WP:CORP.Mwarsame (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The added refs were two database listings (this and that), which may help establish that the film exists but say nothing about its notability. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry Mwarsame. While I appreciate your efforts to show the short film as existing (really not in doubt), please review WP:NF. if you can find and offer reviews of the film in reliable sources I could review my delete. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I am not sure whether 30000 U-tube views is significant but I doubt it constitutes notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.