Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duuechkie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete g1, complete bollocks, yet another "word we made up that means whatever we want it to mean", WP:NFT, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Duuechkie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Neologism with no assertion of notability except for local usage. No sources. Delete. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * And what would you like us to list as a source? Its kind of hard for us to prove that its commanly used in our community other then taking our word for it. Big lad7 (talk) 00:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * And that's the whole problem right there. See, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so it requires all of its content to be verifiable, so "taking your word for it" is something we just cannot do. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 00:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * So then what would you take to verify it?Big lad7 (talk) 01:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources deemed reliable. Finding them is up to you. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. VG &#x260E; 01:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. A Google search on this word spelled exactly as in the title of the article returns zero results. For some reason, even the Wikipedia article doesn't show up. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.