Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 12:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable watch lacking GHITs and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:N.  ttonyb (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Eisenhower's watch, if this is really it, would be a cool thing to own or to see, but no sources are presented to show that this item satisfies the general notability guideline WP:N, and notability is not inherited for every artifact said to have once been owned by a notable person. Edison (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. If the watch was more notable on its own, maybe, but it appears to just be a normal DateJust that was owned by Eisenhower. Also a photo of the watch might be useful, especially if it had the Rolex logo replaced by a Swastika.  Golgofrinchian  (talk)  21:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. If this is notable at all, it should be mentioned in Dwight D. Eisenhower. I very much doubt that is a good idea, though. /Julle (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: lacks independant notability and fails the GNG. Editors should also visit Articles for deletion/Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket.  bahamut0013  words deeds 13:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Edison. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 11:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.