Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable jacket lacking GHITs and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:N.  ttonyb (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The Eisenhower jacket was a notable uniform part in World War 2, but this particular jacket, part of a private collection, does not inherit that notability without satisfying the guideline WP:N via multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage, even though some association with Eisenhower is claimed. Edison (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Sell to the Pawn Stars and delete: interesting, but lacks independant notability and fails GNG. Editors should proabbly also weigh in at Articles for deletion/Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch.  bahamut0013  words deeds 13:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same reasons as in Articles for deletion/Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch. /Julle (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge - Take what information is supported by reliable sources, and place in article regarding Dwight D. Eisenhower. Subject of this article is not notable, whereas the type of the subject is, as stated prior. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I was going to suggest a merge to Eisenhower jacket but on second thought, it's not notable enough even for a redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.