Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyadic essays


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Dyadic essays

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional, no evidence of notability, suspect references like blogs, no in-line citations so we don't know what facts are supported Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree completely. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably delete for now as although Books and browser appeared to have found results, there's nothing to suggest improvement and, if restarted, it'll need familiar attention and better sourcing. SwisterTwister   talk  05:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - some minor mentions on books and scholar, but not enough to cross the WP:GNG or WP:BASIC thresholds.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.